| _ |
_____Mentioning
my "philo" is a good choice, but it is a part
of a tri-philo-sophy, based on one of my rules, (I have more
'rules' than Wittgenstein, my challenger in phi): "Before
using a word, you should fully define it, but only after
defining 'definition"! (to make
a hammer, you first make a hammer, (Spinoza!) Impossible? juicy! you end
with:
"The
value of a 'definition' depends on the value of the 'definition' of its
environment";
_____So
"autism" should be defined in a scientific
study
of "conscience" that should be defined in a scientific study of
"psychology" that should be defined in a scientific
study of "philosophy". And stop to this definition of "abnormal,
who is not normal, after defining "normal" from "abnormal", (W. James scripsit!)
Would you like the "normal definition of "normal" by an abnormal?
a fellow in a uniform, such as Eichman
seen by Arendt.
_____And
no type of autisms should be forgotten, especially these cases, obvious
in Einstein, Newton, Wittgenstein, and
that case of "prosopautism" found in Darwin.
They probably have the key to the good usage of "autisms" and a plan of
education for all.
_____Sorry
for Dr. Tony but he slipped over any "phi", mentioning some weak "Theory
of Mind". I see "true philosophers" as challengers. And "autism"?
"If GOD does
exists, what's the message? If not, what's the usage?"
_____I'm
restarting my course on creativity,
(stopped in 1976, because nobody followed, on "a possible type of thinking
by/with/for/because
the Computer", the puzzle of Turing). I had plenty of time
to create examples, bleeding, bloody! (for instance, when my daughter was
given to Spaniards hysterical nuns, "messianism" was over!) In fact, she
was my equilibrium)
_____I'm
used to "surprise-diplomas", like my title of International
Expert at the Int. Work Office in Geneva, (1971) without begging,
just for finding, (1965), the famous M.I.S.
searched by thousands of cobol-coders. Nice demo for creativity?, (I've
done worse!) I just said: "Wait till we have a rightful copyright", (I
waited 20 years!).
_____To
help me, please find me children "retarded in talking", kind of Albert
speaking at 4, but immediately with complete sentences. "Winner"? Birger
Sellin, writing a book at 18, (then sorry for it!). Me: in a country where
school at 4 is compulsory, I was sent at 5 years, 5 months, 5 days! "because
no hurry". But "holy communion" with a dispense of age.
_____Then
elected for the "most incredible crossing of
the XXth Century"... In fact, after silence during 50 years, reduced
to "demos", (bleeding, bloody typed), I think my type has a knack to see
the "glow of Branly" or the "dust of Fleming". Maybe unconsciously just
using the first Darwinian principle.
_____Interested
also in autistic children solving puzzles without the pictures. I think
that, transmitting this gift from "hard world" to "soft world" could be
the famous thinking by analogy, only known in Vinci
and the "Greeks of the Miracle", (never say "Thinking in picture but thinking
in structures")
_____Therefore,
invitation to celebrate Monna Lisa's 500th birthday
in Jan. 2003.
_____Thank
you for reading.. |
NOTES:
.
.
.1/ Why did the
best
philosopher of the XXth Century say:
"Everybody
must dedicate ten minutes to philosophy, just to understand that it's "gibberish"?
Because "philosophy" was
born from a need to justify slavery. That's a big one! but read one of
the first philosophic text, by "Divine Platon" and consider that most "philosophers"
start their practice from this aristo-sopher, (his real name was "Aritoclès"
and his pupil-ennemy is "Aristotélès"). This
doctrine is the chief base of the Ghost-Spell,
"Slaves
should obey their masters!"
introduced by Paul of Tarse,
visiting Greece because "Messianism" was expelled from Rome, by Claudius,
as soon as 42, (a strange mystery, perfectly explainable!):
_______We
must introduce "bases for thinking", the way of "Philosopher
Newton" and all scientists decided
to understand how our brain works. And reintroduce the "analogy"
used by the Greeks of the Miracle. In the meantime, it's a game to burst
all those "FalSophers" made in Sorbonique... (all the more dangerous because
not everything bad, some discoveries).
_______Therefore,
"philosophy" present two lines: the "scientist",
(efficient, that I describe) and the "sorbonist"
continuing the "Crime against Being" which started with the idea of using
writing to dominate people instead of educating it. Strange, any progress
by the first circle is immediatly copied, "ape'd and monkey'd", by the
second one, (the "prout-sophy"
produced by "philo-bidets"! Easy to burst them!)
._______But
one advantage of my "theory
of Mind" is to classify
everybody, even "high ranked professors", inside a "noodigm". Like it and
not! I see the faces of my frog-sopher of sciences, making a lot of dollars
in Yale and Princeton, with his medal of "pre-darwinien". Quite
unable to understand 2d Darwinian principle...
_______My
philo-minister? (Hairy Sopher), like President-unelect-JosPain's mistress:a
"".
_______Thank
you! thank you! with my fresh title of "WINNER 2002", I'm going to challenge
him in front of all the students the world over.
.
.
2/ Our time is
really turning mad. Now all protesting-in-vain groups, ("maleteros",
"espontaneos"), could be reunited by a True-Sophy of True Civilisation,
from "Greens" and "Mondialists" to "Racists" and "Terrorists". The "searchligts"
write books but admit that don't know any solution. Not even the
elective system, promoting "relative nobodies", (read in the Time for French
Raffarin!) that must disappear the very day they are replaced, (Gonzalez,
JosPain, DeBill Clito, Koln...) I explain it in the "Pagoda of Secular
Arms")
_______Just
think that the XXth Century was dominated by two second-rate books.
But if the Fall of Berlin is the Fall of "My Kampf" and Nazism, it opened
the way to "The Kapital" and Sovietism. Therefore, by "analogy", I duly
saw the Fall of the Wall would be the comeback of "satammisms",
First Cause of these two books. Anybody understanding the "satammist phenomena"
should have seen it; and I wonder what would be the state of the World
if Roosevelt, Churchill, McHarlot de Gaulle, Mitreux Médicis et
so many "custom chiefs" had been taught this "Crime against Being".
_______We
should therefore demand of my Pal Pope Paul@K, (and from his Mafia),
more than a confession (of 2000 years of crimes and a CanosShalom), but
the description of the satammist criminal
structure and a program of reparations. Let's follow the Celsus
Method!
|
|
__
